Bitcoin erases 45% of recent price gains

Bitcoin fell at the end of the last trading week, erasing a major portion of the recent price gains. As Omkar Godbole ( writes, “after a drop back to below $7,800, the cryptocurrency has erased nearly -45% of the rise from $6,850 to $8,463 witnessed in the six days to Jan. 8, according to CoinDesk’s Bitcoin Price Index.” Bitcoin is currently (3.50 PM GMT, Jan. 11) trading near $8,084, a -1.4% fall from the day’s opening price.

Looking forward, Godbole thinks that “a deeper drop to key support below $7,600 cannot be ruled out. Bitcoin has dived out of an ascending trendline on the hourly chart, violating the bullish higher – lows pattern. Further, it has found acceptance under the widely-tracked 100-hour average, with the relative strength index (RSI) reporting bearish conditions below 50.

Bitcoin created a spinning top candle on Wednesday, signaling indecision in the market place. That ended with bears coming out victorious, as indicated by Thursday’s -2.9% drop. Put simply, the odds of a slide to $7,555 – a former hurdle-turned-support of the inverse head-and-shoulders neckline – have increased over the last hours. The breakout, however, would be invalidated only if Bitcoin prints a UTC close above $7,555.”

Selling volumes, Godbole concludes, have dropped throughout the pullback from $8,463 to $7,700. “A low-volume pullback is often short-lived. Hence, the bears need to observe caution despite signs of weakness in the hourly and daily charts. A move above $8,000, a level which acted as a strong hurdle on Thursday, will imply an end of the pullback and will likely yield a re-test of recent highs above $8,400.”

Store of value is Crypto’s best function, Zurrer Says

Ryan Zurrer, founder of Dialectic, a Swiss-based crypto-asset firm focused on on-chain opportunities, believes that store of value was the most viable and desirable use case across crypto in 2019 and offers a basis to increase users in the second decade of crypto.

In a comment published by, he explains that “Collateral-backed crypto assets and alternative stores of value (SoVs) found their niche in 2019. Seeing crypto-natives begin to stake and save as part of the decentralized finance (DeFi) revolution was one of the most exciting trends in the space. We’re also seeing the re-emergence of community-directed capital pools known as DAOs, which are arguably a SoV in their own right.

The bitcoin community seemed to find common ground on its primary niche as a store of value rather than a payment mechanism. The SoV use case has become so compelling that the ethereum community sought to refocus around “programmable money” use cases: “ETH is money” dominated the discourse.

DeFi projects grew quickly. Synthetix grew its collateral-backed synthetic derivatives market by more than 680% in the second half of the year. However, DeFi has always been dominated by MakerDAO, which offers loans in the Dai (now Sai) stablecoin backed by a basket of other ethereum-based assets. Dai/Sai may look like very capital-inefficient mechanisms with an interest rate that reached as high as 20.5% p.a. in 2019, while collateral deposits sit in excess of 320 percent on average. But it’s early days.

These rates price in all of the risks inherent in crypto, from the security perspective to the protocol layer. DeFi interest rates should look more like emerging market rates (i.e. 20%+) than, say, LIBOR+1%.

Moving into the second decade of crypto, I would not be surprised if we see some calamitous black swan event in DeFi, followed by a period of repricing risk appropriately. It is important we maintain perspective here and recognize many DeFi crypto-economic models remain highly experimental and there are important lessons to be learned.

DAOs generated renewed excitement this year. Aragon passed 1,000 DAOs launched, which is a remarkable achievement. MolochDAO spawned dozens of topical offspring and considerable research is being undertaken to make DAOs sustainable and profitable, legally compliant, and more attractive to a wider audience. While DAO experiments flourished, especially noble mission-driven DAOs, most of these organizations were capital pools that store a certain amount of value, funded and coordinated by relatively small groups of known participants.

Detractors argue that DAOs have significant regulatory risk and are currently not truly decentralized, autonomous nor particularly well-organized. But DAOs are evolving quickly, as are the coordination tools to allow disparate participants to efficiently self-organize. There is considerable discussion about how the use of reputation-weighted peer-review combined with the right social tools can dramatically improve DAO coordination.

As we see DAOs professionalize in 2020, we will see premiums offered to enter the most compelling DAO communities while the vast majority of DAOs will trade at a discount to their assets under management (i.e. the store of liquid value that they hold). In cases where the management of a DAO diverges substantially from the original mandate for whatever reason, DAOs will unwind and return value to token-holders in a manner that is quicker and cleaner than what we’ve seen in the past.

SoVs will continue to reign supreme as the primary use case across crypto in 2020. However, we must tackle a few issues to allow SoVs to form the base for a variety of financial applications.

Primarily, we could make for more capital-efficient DeFi mechanisms. One option is to introduce non-transferrable reputation as part of a user’s collateral options. If a debtor is to suffer public reputational risk, they are far less likely to default on a loan. This would enable lower implied interest rates. We could also increase capital efficiency by allowing the underlying capital in DeFi pools to be staked, when a given PoS protocol permits, thereby reducing the interest rate by leveraging the protocol staking returns.

Second, we need to figure out how to appropriately represent off-chain assets on-chain without being confined to walled gardens known as security-token exchanges or excessive use of centralized proxies. Intelligent DAO capital pools should probably have some exposure to gold and other compelling non-correlated assets in order to lower asset-correlation and portfolio volatility. I would personally be more interested in a portfolio that had diverse asset based while still ensuring decentralization.

Thirdly, considerable evangelism needs to be dedicated to markets where crypto has the best chance for advancement – areas that have a combination of large population bases, Mistrust in authorities driven from ineffective fiscal and monetary policies and Strong technical education programs churning out talent. Cities like Beijing, Hangzhou, Mumbai, Bangalore, Taipei, São Paulo and Buenos Aires are good examples of where SoV use-cases could gain substantial traction.

Finally, we will need to figure out how to deal in multiple currencies across multiple chains as a new generation of technically sophisticated crypto-networks come online and begin to interact. Ethereum and the space generally will benefit greatly by interaction with other Layer 1 protocols and I’m optimistic that we will begin to see these initial cross-chain synergies in 2020 as other projects such as Filecoin, NEAR, Cosmos, Polkadot and others come online and gain traction.

The adage that if you give someone a lever and an incentive, she can move the world seems especially poignant for our industry at this juncture. Using crypto still implies significant friction for most. Thus, new users to our space will tend to hurdle these considerable obstacles only when there is an extremely compelling financial incentive to do so. This may be avoidance of their country’s monetary misfortunes, the search for higher yield opportunities in an economic downturn and/or otherwise seeking better financing conditions. Nevertheless, a decade since the birth of bitcoin, we can safely say that crypto has found a compelling use case as the store of value reigns supreme.”

Japan’s Finance minister issues warning of digital Yuan ‘dangers’

Japan’s Finance Minister Taro Aso has warned bankers in the country of potential problems caused by China’s forthcoming digital yuan launch, hinting that a Beijing-issued digital fiat could cause a rift between Tokyo and Washington. As reported by Tim Alper (, Reuters wrote that the Japanese minister told a summit of Japanese bankers that “China will likely seek to make international payments in its new digital currency, intimating that Washington would likely to take a dim view of countries choosing to use the digital yuan in place of the dollar in international trade deals”, and pointed out that his country, a member of the G7, overwhelmingly uses the dollar for international trade, warning that the digital yuan could thus pose a “huge problem” for Japan’s traders and exporters.

Bilateral trade between China and Japan rose by +8.1% in 2018, Ministry of Commerce statistics show. Aso warned also that the US and China could enter a “new Cold War,” and said that in 2020, “In the US, anti-China sentiment will be unilateral in both the House and Senate.” The remarks were Aso’s first on the digital yuan, although he was referring to both cryptocurrencies and stablecoins in the past. Meanwhile, the South China Morning Post reports that the central People’s Bank of China has said it made “smooth progress” on its digital fiat in 2019, but stopped short of announcing when the digital yuan would first see the light of day.

Related Articles

Crypto carry trade (part one)
The current international monetary environment is characterized by ultra-expansionary monetary policies undertaken by…

Read more >
Passive and Aggressive orders
In forex trading, traders often use passive and aggressive orders in their daily…

Read more >
The Rate-of-Change (ROC)
In the technical analysis of forex markets, the Rate-of-Change (ROC) is a momentum…

Read more >